 |
First report of raltegravir (RAL, MK-0518) use after virologic rebound on elvitegravir (EVT, GS 9137)
Presented by Edwin DeJesus, United States.
DeJesus E.1, Cohen C.2, Elion R.3, Ortiz R.1, Maroldo L.4, Franson S.4, Pesano R.4
1Orlando Immunology Center, Orlando, United States, 2CRI New England, Boston, United States, 3George Washington University, Washington DC, United States, 4Monogram Biosciences, San Francisco, United States
Objectives: Data are limited about the clinical implications of resistance patterns and the possibility of sequencing integrase inhibitors (INI). We describe the clinical responses from 2 patients treated sequentially with INI. Methods: After IRB approval and informed consent, 2 patients with virologic failure on elvitegravir were switched to raltegravir 400mg BID x7 days with the same background regimen (BR). At day-8, the regimen was re-optimized (OBR). Activity and safety labs, Phenosense-GT and samples for integrase sequence (IS) were collected at baseline(BL) and follow-up. Results: Results are described for both patients 1 and 2; BL = transition from EVT to RAL, WK1 = RAL + BR, WK2 = RAL + OBR, WK4-24 = follow-up.
| | 1 | 2 | | | CD4 | VL | ARV | CD4 | VL | ARV | | BASELINE | 204 | 10,700 | TVD/ENF/EVT | 459 | 840 | TVD/EVT | | WEEK 1 | 194 | 7,254 | TVD/ENF/RAL | 499 | 427 | TVD/RAL | | WEEK 2 | | 1,039 | TVD/ENF/RAL/DRV | | 189 | TVD/RAL/DRV | | WEEK 4 | | 808 | | 457 | <50 | | | WEEK 8 | 203 | 2,137 | | 639 | <50 | | | WEEK 12 | 247 | 2,893 | | 592 | <50 | | | WEEK 24 | DISCONTINUED | | <50 | |
IS at BL and WK1 for patient 1 showed similar patterns including K7R, S17N, V31I, V72I, T124N, T125A, I151V, V201I, V234L, A265A/V, and other mutations suspected to be associated with resistance to one or both INI: E138E/K, G140G/C, S147S/G and Q148R. IS for patient 2 was nonamplifiable. Regimens were well tolerated; no grade >1 adverse events reported. Further enrollment was halted given the lack of significant virologic activity observed. Conclusions: These data support the possibility that at least some cross-resistance occurs between elvitegravir and raltegravir. Data with drug levels were not available to assess the possibility of a negative drug-drug interaction.
Back to the session -
Back to the Programme-at-a-Glance
|
|